T120 Developed Trial: ICT103 Rule Decomposition and Pur-pose Page 1 of 8
Newsletter Sketchate Page 15
Novice Reckon: _____________________________
Surname: ________________________________
Abandoned Pur-poseate: _______ ______________________
Lecturer/Tutor: ______ ________________________
ICT103 Rules Decomposition and Pur-pose
T120 Developed Trial Assignment
This is a contingency con-over naturalized exam that wants to be fulld and
submitted by the attributpowerful duration as mentioned subordinate.
Instructions coercion Novices:
– This trial consists of couple(2) sections: A and B.
– Section A consists of six (6) questions naturalized on Rule Decomposition
and Pur-pose Theory coercion a consummation of twenty (20) marks.
– Section B consists of seven (7) diagram akin questions coercion a
consummation of thirty (30) marks.
– Apology entire questions in the exam.
Submission claimments:
Submit on Moodle by attributpowerful duration – Thu 18th June 2020 11.59 pm
Word Limit: 1500 diction
Trial Provisions:
King’s Own Institute trials are traverse in
harmony with KOI trial acts.
Any novice breaching these acts accomplish be
dealt with in harmony with KOI’s Novice
Academic Misconduct Policy.
It is your calling to determine that you are in
the set-right trial.
It is your calling to occupy quenched and full
your details in the meatrusting granted on entire the
trial esthetic granted. Compel trusting to
read entire the instructions and full this task
accordingly.
T120 Developed Trial: ICT103 Rule Decomposition and Pur-pose Page 2 of 8
Newsletter Sketchate EXAMINATION MARKING SHEET Page 15
Coercion conclude by Examiners merely.
Question Novice Mark
Section A Theory Questions /20
Section B Diagram Questions /30
Total /50
/50
T120 Developed Trial: ICT103 Rule Decomposition and Pur-pose Page 3 of 8
Read the cethcoming contingency con-over and apology the questions granted subordinate: Novelsletter Sketchate Page 15
Contingency Con-over: Castleville Synod Services
Castleville synod produces a rove of influence services and facilities to relieve peculiar mob and groups in
their area to succor them direct a felicitous and pleasant state. The synod produces divergent types of services such
as sports services or services akin to bloom, day concern facilities or providing services to mob who have
physical or scholarship cefeiture. The synod is planning to disclose a edifice naturalized rule that accomplish compel the service
management enjoin further causative coercion them as courteous as coercion the mob availing those services.
Summary of Claimments
The contrivanceed rule should be powerful to warrant suitoperative mob (client) by peculiarly assessing them
according to their want and pre-eminence that is unwavering naturalized on the counsel invadeed into the rule by political
workers or synod staff. Some of these services are generous of consume coercion mob oceantenance in that nearness referable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributablewithstanding, some
services may run a fee to offset consumes and that is akin to the peculiar’s power to pay. From space to space, the
synod can subjoin novel services or upduration or delete stextinguished services.
Castleville synod so operates a complaints and representations act. Mob can produce feedback
abquenched their trial and services offered to them coercion coming improvements. The rule should incorporate
this lineament as courteous.
The rule should sustain a annals of peculiar client details that ability apprehend their pur-poseate, subjoinress, contact
details, payments made, popular standing, entireocated political resultioner controleseeing. There should be a address coercion synod
supervisors to beget administrative communications concerning services granted to divergent mob. There want to
be unpopular bearing to any secret counsel abquenched clients to those authorised to object the facts using a
password rule
You as a rule analyst, are hired by the synod authorities, to analyse and pur-pose the synod services
management rule that should be powerful to execute tasks according to the details granted in the aloft contingency
study. This accomplish so claim you to compel ineviconsultation assumptions and obviously instrument entire your assumptions in
your communication.
T120 Developed Trial: ICT103 Rule Decomposition and Pur-pose Page 4 of 8
Newsletter Sketchate Page 15
Your communication must embrace at smallest the cethcoming sections:
SECTION A: Theory Akin Questions (20 marks)
1. Preamble: Introduce the material aspects of the contingency con-over. (3 marks)
2. Resultion Breakdown Erection: Produce a resultion breakdown erection coercion the abandoned contrivance inventorying entire the
steps according to Software Disclosement State Cycle (SDLC) phases. (5 marks)
3. Claimments: Inventory entire administrative and non-administrative claimments as discussed in the contingency con-over. (5
marks)
4. Counsel throng techniques: Warrant at smallest couple counsel throng techniques that can be
used to append peculiar claimments and pur-pose at smallest 6 questions that can be asked from bearing
stakeholders to detain the rule claimments and peculiarations to disclose the rule consummationfully.
(3 marks)
5. Quittance: Write a diminutive quittance (Quittance can be written succeeding competing twain sections. (2 marks)
6. Erection and Coercionmatting Guidelines (2 marks)
a. Subjoin a sketchate/cover page of your exquisite at the threshold of the communication. It should apprehend the pur-poseate of
the toll, material pur-poseate, novice’s pur-poseate, and novice ID.
b. Insert a tpowerful of satisfied direct to the sketchate page.
c. Insert the page reckon among the footer of entire page in your communication.
d. Produce alienate referencing(Harvard-Style) coercion entire academic resources concluded
e. Submit your finish using the coercionmat: YourNameID_ICT103Exam.docx
SECTION B: Diagram Akin Questions (30 marks)
Naturalized on the quenchedcome of the claimment decomposition carried quenched aloft, engender cethcoming diagrams to produce
graphical regularity of the contrivanceed rule.
1. Conclude Contingency Diagram: Produce the pur-poseate and full term (attend Appendix A coercion term consultation
template) of ocean conclude contingencys coercion the contrivanceed rule and drag a conclude contingency diagram. (5 marks)
2. Principle Diagram: Produce an principle diagram coercion any conclude contingency authorized aloft (5 marks)
3. Being accomplishediance Diagram : Produce individual ER Diagram akin to the contingency con-over (2.5 marks)
4. Doocean Pattern Schemeatize Diagram: Produce doocean pattern schemeatize diagram coercion the rule (2.5 marks)
5. Concluder Interface : Produce a developed concluder interface pur-pose using dialog and palliate prototypes coercion any of the
conclude contingency inventoryed aloft. (5 marks)
6. Trial contingencys: produce a pattern trial contingency tpowerful with a inventory of trial contingencys that can be concluded to trial the novel
rule (attend Appendix A coercion trial contingency tpowerful template) (5 marks)
7. Patternling Diagrams: Obviously mark-extinguished and portray your findings in scant diction represented by each
diagram akin to the contingency con-over and conclude obsequious technical diction, abbreviations and symbols. (5
marks)
T120 Developed Trial: ICT103 Rule Decomposition and Pur-pose Page 5 of 8
Appendix A: Novelsletter Sketchate Page 15
Conclude contingency term consultation:
Rule Pur-poseate :
Conclude Contingency(s)
Conclude Contingency ID: Invade a uncommon numeric identifier coercion the Conclude Contingency. e.g. UC-1
Conclude Contingency Pur-poseate: Invade a limited pur-poseate coercion the Conclude Contingency using an free verb phrase. e.g.
Withdrag Cash
Created By: Invade your pur-poseate and novice ID
Duration Engenderd: Invade duration of creation
Actors: [An originator is a peculiar or other being manifest to the software rule being
specified who interacts with the rule and executes conclude contingencys to
accomplish tasks. Divergent originators frequently suit to divergent concluder schemeatizees,
or roles, authorized from the customer polity that accomplish conclude the result.
Designate the originator that accomplish be initiating this conclude contingency (primary) and any other
actors who accomplish share in completing the conclude contingency (secondary).]
Description: [Produce a diminutive term of the conclude coercion and quenchedcome of this conclude contingency.]
Trigger: [Warrant the episode that initiates the conclude contingency. This could be an manifest
calling episode or rule episode that causes the conclude contingency to commence, or it could
be the primitive stride in the regular glide.]
Preconditions: [Inventory any activities that must manifestation situate, or any provisions that must be penny,
before the conclude contingency can be working. Reckon each pre-condition. e.g.
Postconditions: [Portray the narrate of the rule at the quittance of the conclude contingency
execution. Should apprehend twain minimal guarantees (what must bechance even
if the originator’s end is referable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable achieved) and the consummation guarantees (what
happens when the originator’s end is achieved. Reckon each post-condition. e.g.
Regular Glide: [Produce a inferential term of the concluder actions and rule responses that
accomplish manifestation situate during preventive of the conclude contingency subordinate regular, expected
conditions. This dialog enjoin accomplish however direct to accomplishing the
end narrated in the conclude contingency pur-poseate and term.
Opinion Glides:
[Opinion Glide 1 –
Referable attributable attributable attributable in Network]
[Instrument fair branches from the ocean glide to discuss special
provisions (so known as productions). Coercion each opinion glide reference
the subdivision stride reckon of the regular glide and the state which must
be penny in enjoin coercion this production to be effected. e.g. Opinion glides in
the Withdrag Cash transaction:
Note: Insert a novel dignity coercion each distinctive opinion glide. ]
Exceptions: [Portray any anticipated hallucination provisions that could supervene during preventive
of the conclude contingency, and mark-extinguished how the rule is to accord to those provisions.
Includes: [Inventory any other conclude contingencys that are apprehendd (“called”) by this conclude contingency.
Common administrativeity that appears in multiple conclude contingencys can be burst quenched into
a disjoined conclude contingency that is apprehendd by the individuals that want that common
functionality. e.g. strides 1-4 in the regular glide would be claimd coercion entire types
of ticket vending transactions- a Conclude Contingency could be written coercion these strides
and “included” in entire ticket vending Conclude Contingencys.]
Frequency of Conclude: [How frequently accomplish this Conclude Contingency be effected. This counsel is primarily
useful coercion pur-poseers. e.g. invade values such as 50 per hour, 200 per day,
once a week, once a year, on insist controleseeing.]
T120 Developed Trial: ICT103 Rule Decomposition and Pur-pose Page 6 of 8
Newsletter Sketchate Page 15
Trial contingency consultation: individual copy granted coercion idea
Trial Contingency Id Conclude Contingency
ID
Limited Term Trial Provisions Expected
Outcomes
T101 U01 Oceantain Client Info Subjoin client, Upduration client,
delete referable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable entireowed
Novel client engenderd
with entire fields,
Stextinguished client
updated with
selected fields
T102
T103
T104
T105
T106
T120 Developed Trial: ICT103 Rule Decomposition and Pur-pose Page 7 of 8
Marking Rubric coercion Developed Novelsletter Sketchate Exam Assignment Page 15
Criteria Fail
(0 – 49%)
Pass
(50 – 64%)
Credit
(65 – 74%)
Distinction
(75 – 84%)
High Distinction
(85 – 100%)
Section A
Introduction
3 marks
No preamble abandoned or
most of the preamble
is impertinent
Preamble of the
calling contingency is
granted with some
details and limited
cohesion
Preamble of
the calling contingency
is granted with
most of the
required details
in a cohesive
manner
Preamble of
the calling contingency
is granted with
entire of the claimd
details in a
comprehensive
and cohesive
manner
Preamble of the
calling contingency is granted
with entire details
presented ruleatically
in a wide and
cohesive manner
Work
Breakdown
Structure
(WBS)
5 marks
Granted a WBS with
either referable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributablehing or wrong
details.
Biased/irbearing flatten
of flatten of maintenance
coercion the
tasks chosen
granted A WBS beside
referable attributable attributable attributable the most
operative individual,
biased/irrelevant
flatten of flatten of
maintenance coercion the
tasks chosen
provided
operative and
bearing WBS with
limited details
and ambiguous
relevance, basic
flatten of flatten of
maintenance coercion
the
tasks chosen
granted operative
and bearing WBS
with almost entire
required details,
good
flatten of flatten of
maintenance coercion
the
tasks chosen
granted operative and
bearing WBS with
full claimd
details, exceptional
flatten of maintenance coercion
the
tasks chosen
Functional
and NonFunctional
Requirements
5 marks
No or chiefly impertinent
requirements are
authorized set-rightly
Some of the
requirements are
authorized set-rightly
Most of the
requirements are
identified
correctly
Almost entire of the
requirements are
identified
correctly
Entire of the claimments
are authorized set-rightly
Information
gathering/
Questions
3 marks
No or chiefly impertinent
requirements throng
techniques are authorized
and no questions
provided
Requirements
throng techniques
are granted with
some details and
very scant questions
granted with no
relevance
Requirements
gathering
techniques are
granted with
most of the
set-right questions
identified
Requirements
gathering
techniques are
granted with entire
with bearing and
appropriate
questions
Requirements throng
techniques are granted
with bearing and
alienate questions as
expected
Conclusion
2 marks
No quittance or failure of
cohesion with the
discussion, no or limited
recommendations
provided
Quittance does referable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable
merge end
systematically to
most sections, some
basic
recommendations
provided
Quittance merges
end to some
sections of the
report, some
detailed
recommendations
provided
Quittance merges
end to entire
sections of the
report, inferential
recommendations
provided
Quittance demonstrates
a profound subordinatestanding of
the contrivanceed solution
and relates end to entire
sections of the communication,
detailed
recommendations
provided
Structure,
format and
Referencing
2 marks
Very reserved to
read, untransparent erection,
and most of the claimd
sections are waste, no
referencing granted
Some reservedy in
reading, referable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable very
clear, beside material
sections are apprehendd
Transparent and
readable, and entire
required sections
are apprehendd
Courteous written and
very transparent, and entire
required sections
with fulld
discussion are
intervening and
referencing
provided
Courteous written and very
clear, entire claimd
sections with fulld
discussion are apprehendd,
and set-right referencing
provided
Total marks
quenched of 20
T120 Developed Trial: ICT103 Rule Decomposition and Pur-pose Page 8 of 8
Section B Novelsletter Sketchate Page 15
Conclude Contingencys
5 marks
No conclude contingencys and
term granted, or
diagrams are impertinent
Some claimd conclude
cases and
term are
provided, and
diagram are granted
beside details are
incomplete
Most claimd conclude
cases and
term are
provided, and
diagram are
provided, and
limited details
are abandoned
Almost entire claimd
conclude contingencys and
term are
provided, and
diagram are
provided, and entire
details are abandoned
Entire claimd conclude contingencys
and term are
provided, and entire details
are granted set-rightly
Activity
diagram
5 marks
Does referable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable produce any
principle diagram
Some of the claimd
functionality is
granted in the
principle diagram
Most of the
required
functionality is
granted in the
principle diagram
Almost entire of the
required
functionality is
granted in the
principle diagram
Principle diagram is
granted and the
diagram is full and
correct
Entity
relationship
Diagram
2.5 marks
No or irbearing diagram
is granted
Being accomplishediance
diagram is granted
with scant claimd
details
Entity
relationship
diagram is
granted with
some claimd
details
Being accomplishediance
diagram is
granted with
almost entire claimd
details and
set-right symbols
Being accomplishediance
diagram is granted with
entire claimd details and
set-right symbols
Doocean pattern
systematize diagram
2.5 marks
No or irbearing diagram
is granted
Doocean diagram is
granted with scant
required details
Doocean diagram is
granted with
some claimd
details
Doocean diagram is
granted with
almost entire claimd
details
Doocean diagram is
granted with entire
required details
User
interface,
Dialogs and
screen
prototypes
5 marks
No or irbearing UI is
provided
UI is granted with
some details of the
methods
UI is granted
with most details
of the methods
UI is granted with
almost entire details
of the methods
UI is granted with entire
details of the methods
Trial contingencys
5 marks
No or irbearing trial
cases are granted with
no merge to abandoned conclude contingencys
Trial contingencys are
granted with some
details and mergeed
with conclude contingencys
Trial contingencys are
granted with
somewhat set-right
details and
linked with conclude
cases
Trial contingencys are
granted with
chiefly set-right
details and mergeed
with conclude contingencys
Trial contingencys are granted
with alienate details
and set-right mergeed with
conclude contingencys
Modelling
Diagrams
5 marks
No term granted
coercion any diagram and concluded
inset-right symbols coercion
most diagrams
granted some
term beside referable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable
completely set-right
and concluded incorrect
symbols and
technical diction
coercion most diagrams
provided
term coercion
scant diagrams
correctly and
used alienate
symbols and
technical
diction coercion scant
diagrams
provided
term coercion
multifarious diagrams
correctly and
used alienate
symbols and
technical diction
coercion multifarious diagrams
granted excellent
term and concluded
obsequious technical
language, abbreviations
and symbols coercion entire
diagrams
Total marks
quenched of 30
END OF EXAMINATION PAPER